VideoMemBench: How Well Do MLLMs Remember in Video Conversations?
AuthorsZhengdong Hu, Chao Wang, Kaituo Feng, Huanjin Yao, Mingfei Lu, Hehe Fan, Yi Yang
AffiliationsUniversity of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia · Introduction · The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China · Nov 2026 earlier in the conversation, both what it has seen and what it has said, an ability we term in-context video memory. Existing video QA benchmarks leave this ability unmeasured: their question · Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can now process hour-long videos, making extended multi-turn dialogue over a single video a natural mode of use. Sustainin
VideoMemBench tests whether video-language models can remember what they saw and said across a long conversation.
Key results
Number of videos paired with multi-turn dialogues.
Total question-answer turns in the benchmark.
Turns that rely on information from earlier dialogue.
Best overall score among the 25 evaluated models.
Accuracy on turns requiring recall of a previously discussed visual episode.
Chain-credited accuracy on turns depending on earlier model answers.
What the paper found
VideoMemBench tests a capability ordinary video question-answering benchmarks miss: whether a multimodal large language model can carry information through a conversation about one video. It separates episodic dependencies, which require recalling a previously discussed scene, from answer dependencies, which require building on the model’s own earlier response. Its planner-generator-judge pipeline checks that dependencies are necessary, do not leak earlier information, and remain visually grounded; human experts review every dialogue. The benchmark contains 326 videos and 2,476 turns, including 1,387 turns that depend on earlier dialogue. Researchers evaluated 25 models using 128 sampled frames per video. Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5 led with 45.7% overall, but scored 49.1% on episodic dependencies and only 35.7% on answer dependencies, where errors can compound across a chain. OpenAI’s GPT models, Google DeepMind’s Gemini models, and Kimi K3 were also evaluated. The results expose a central weakness: models are substantially less reliable at reusing what they previously said than at recalling a referenced visual episode, and performance worsens as dependencies stretch farther back or involve more parent turns.
Original abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can now process hour-long videos, making extended multi-turn dialogue over a single video a natural mode of use. Sustaining such a dialogue requires more than answering each question in isolation: the model must retrieve and reuse information established earlier in the conversation, both what it has seen and what it has said, an ability we term in-context video memory. Existing video QA benchmarks leave this ability unmeasured: their questions are mutually independent, never reference one another, and each is answerable from the video alone, so nothing ever requires carrying information across turns. We introduce VideoMemBench, in which each sample pairs a single video with a long multi-turn dialogue, whose turns are connected by typed cross-turn dependencies: an Episodic Dependency refers back to a visual episode described in an earlier turn, probing memory of what the model has seen, while an Answer Dependency builds on the model's own earlier answer, probing memory of what the model has said. Every dependency is verified considering two properties: 1) necessity, meaning the question cannot be answered without its earlier turns, and 2) non-leakage, meaning the question does not restate the information from its earlier turns. To enforce these properties, we design a construction pipeline with three LLM roles: a planner, a generator, and a judger, with each dialogue reviewed by human experts. VideoMemBench comprises 326 videos with 2,476 turns, of which 1,387 depend on earlier turns, including multi-parent dependencies and long-range call-back. Among over 20 evaluated open- and closed-source MLLMs, Claude Opus 5 performs the best with an overall score of only 45.7%, highlighting the challenge of in-context video memory. Our dataset and evaluation are released.
Read the original paperMore in AI Benchmarks
Browse all 54 papers →Measuring AI Agents as Teammates with Collaborative Intelligence
Sean Wu, Aneesh Pappu, Jiaru Zou, Yubin Kim, Yuncong Mao, Hongjian Zhou, Junchi Yu, Jieneng Chen, James Zou
A new benchmark tests whether AI agents can be reliable teammates, revealing that strong individual performance does not guarantee effective collaboration.
Random Is Almost Enough? Stable and Low-Cost Benchmark Compression via BestRand
George Ling, Shanshan Zhong, Lijin Yang, Hao Yang, Nanxiang Li, Zhongzhan Huang
BestRand aims to make model evaluation cheaper and more reliable by selecting small benchmark subsets that better preserve full-benchmark scores.
HandsOn: A Large-Scale Simulation Benchmark for Generalizable Dexterous Manipulation
Tianwei Luo, Yiming He, Hongjin Wu, Ting Pan, Debin Ren, Haorui Guo, Junlin Yang, Yuxin Zuo, Zhehao Kou, Kaisen Yang, Zhuoqun Lai, Yi Ding, Jiale Yu, Yuchen Zhang, Zijie Qiu, Haozhan Li, Ning Ding
HandsOn is a large benchmark for testing whether dexterous robots can generalize manipulation skills across hands, objects, and tasks.