NTH

Strategy-first synthesis planning for complex natural products

AuthorsDaniel Armstrong, Xuan-Vu Nguyen, Octavian Susanu, Gabriel Gibberd, Théo A. Neukomm, Taddäus Strunden, Dan Forster, Morgane Delattre, Shawn Teh, Clément Rols, John Federice, Hayden Leatherwood, M. Lavelle Barnes, Maarten R. Dobbelaere, Peter Wipf, Jon T. Njardarson, Jieping Zhu, Philippe Schwaller

August 18, 2026 3 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

SynthEx uses an agentic large language model to design and refine ambitious natural-product synthesis routes that experts found comparable to human plans.

Key results

1,098
Natural-product benchmark

Number of structurally complex natural-product targets evaluated.

13.8%
AiZynthFinder solve rate

Target-level solve rate for the near-exhaustive conventional baseline.

63.9%
SynthEx stitched solve rate

Solve rate after SynthEx strategic planning and short AiZynthFinder leaf completion.

33,145
SynthAtlas reaction steps

Fully specified, atom-mapped reaction steps released in the route corpus.

16.0%
Ring-forming step share

Fraction of SynthEx steps that increase the number of molecular rings.

13.5%
RetroChimera top-1 recovery

Fraction of SynthEx disconnections reproduced in RetroChimera’s top prediction.

What the paper found

The paper introduces SynthEx, an agentic synthesis planner built on Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview that plans complex natural-product syntheses strategy first rather than retrieving disconnections from a fixed reaction library. Its Strategy Generator proposes competing key disconnections, a Route Builder converts them into atom-level graph edits using the template-free ReactionJSON representation, and Critic–Editor agents iteratively simulate, repair, and preserve the overarching strategy. On a benchmark of 1,098 structurally complex natural products, conventional AiZynthFinder solved only 13.8% of targets, while SynthEx’s strategic layer plus short template-based leaf completion solved 63.9%. The resulting SynthAtlas contains 33,145 atom-mapped reaction steps and emphasizes chemistry underrepresented in patent-derived data: 16.0% of steps form rings, and RetroChimera recovered SynthEx’s exact disconnection in only 13.5% of cases at top-1 and 31.4% at top-5. In blinded evaluation, ten expert chemists rated SynthEx key steps comparable to published human synthesis steps for feasibility, elegance, and overall quality, although literature routes retained a small advantage in strategic value. The system used Gemini without web access; Claude Opus 4.8 was used separately to identify literature key steps for evaluation. The authors stress that these are computational proposals, not experimentally validated syntheses.

Original abstract

The total synthesis of a complex molecule is among the most demanding intellectual and experimental feats in chemistry: a chemist must plan many steps ahead for how to assemble simple building blocks into an intricate target, devise backup strategies, and anticipate procedural challenges. It is also a profoundly creative activity. For half a century, efforts to automate the retrosynthetic design of natural products and other complex molecules have drawn on catalogued reactions, and the resulting tools now report near-complete success on benchmarks built from that same source. But these tools were shaped to fit benchmarked chemistry, and they falter on many natural products, the frontier of the field, whose densely functionalized, polycyclic architectures demand precisely the inventive chemistry the record contains least. Whether a machine could reasonably design such syntheses like an expert chemist does has remained unclear. Here, we show that SynthEx, an agentic framework built on large language models, plans routes to complex natural products that lie beyond the reach of conventional design algorithms. SynthEx proposes competing strategies, assembles a sequence of routine and key steps into a cohesive route, and critiques and improves its own design; the chemistry it favours is more convergent than existing tools produce, and spans a region of reaction space that catalogue-based tools cannot match. Most notably, in blinded assessments, expert chemists judged its key steps comparable to those of published human syntheses and engaged with them as genuine synthesis plans, a response algorithmic route prediction has not previously accomplished. We release routes to more than a thousand natural products as SynthAtlas, an open, interactive database, and anticipate it will become a shared resource for a collection of complex target molecules that lack existing literature routes.

Read the original paper

More in AI Agents

Browse all 56 papers →
01Agent

LEGO-Anything: Coding Agents for 3D Scene Reconstruction

Xirui Li, Peng Shi, Mingwen Dong, Sheng Zhang, Zhuoyan Xu, Dongkyu Lee, Shuaichen Chang, Yi Xiang, Lin Pan, Jiarong Jiang

LEGO-Anything turns images into editable Blender programs through iterative coding agents, offering a promising but still imperfect route to reconstructable 3D worlds.

Read analysis
02Agent

MILO: Automated Harness Discovery via Orchestrated Multi-Agent Evolution

Prithwish Jana, Mononito Goswami, Hao Liu, Xinyu Li, Langlin Huang, Zhehui Huang, Zhishen Huang, Patrick Blöbaum, Anoop Deoras, Purak Jain, Nikos Kanakaris, Sahika Genc

MILO uses teams of evolving AI agents to automatically discover better harnesses for long-horizon problem-solving systems.

Read analysis
03Agent

Self-Organizing Agent Teams Learn to Reason Together

Aneesh Pappu, Mirac Suzgun, Yongchan Kwon, Federico Bianchi, Batu El, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Hancheng Cao, James Zou

This work trains AI agents to discover how to divide labor, challenge ideas, and combine reasoning so that teams can solve problems no individual agent could solve alone.

Read analysis