NTH

Iris: Climbing to the Search Frontier

AuthorsZiyuan Liu, Hengqi Liu, Zichuan Wang, Yang Qin, Jiachen Liang, Xu Chu, Shaowei Chen, Yuantao Gu, Mu Chuan

September 13, 2026 3 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

Iris trains large language-model search agents to solve harder multi-hop web questions by repeatedly learning from challenging trajectories and managing context more effectively.

Key results

82.2
Iris-mini BrowseComp

Accuracy with discard-all context management.

88.6
Iris-pro BrowseComp

Accuracy with discard-all context management.

92.9
Iris-pro DeepSearchQA

F1 score with context management.

56.4
Iris-pro Humanity’s Last Exam

Text-only HLE accuracy.

17.5
Iris-mini context-management gain

BrowseComp improvement from discard-all over no context management.

What the paper found

Iris introduces Iris-mini and Iris-pro, search agents built from Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B, trained with a pipeline designed to force genuine multi-hop web reasoning. Tasks are reverse-constructed from hyperlink graphs, non-answer entities are rewritten into descriptive references to prevent string matching, and questions are retained only when a reference model fails closed-book but succeeds with evidence. ReAct trajectories are filtered for correctness, degeneracy, search depth, and turn quality before supervised fine-tuning, then optimized with reinforcement learning against live search using an in-cluster Qwen3.5-397B-A17B judge and observation summarizer. The central training strategy, called SFT–RL climbing, repeatedly feeds efficient successful rollouts back into supervised training. With discard-all context management, Iris-mini scores 82.2 on BrowseComp, 84.8 on BrowseComp-ZH, 86.9 F1 on DeepSearchQA, and 52.3 on Humanity’s Last Exam, while Iris-pro reaches 88.6, 85.1, 92.9 F1, and 56.4 respectively. Context management is a major factor: discard-all raises Iris-mini’s BrowseComp score by 17.5 points over the unmanaged baseline. The results position these agents ahead of open-source peers in their parameter ranges, while comparisons also include systems such as DeepSeek-V3.2 and much larger frontier models.

Original abstract

We present Iris-mini and Iris-pro, two search agents trained at the 35B-A3B and 397B-A17B scales, together with the data pipeline and training recipe behind them. Tasks are reverse-constructed from the hyperlink structure of a web corpus: we author multi-hop chains over an entity graph distilled from a seed page and its out-links, rewrite every non-answer entity into a descriptive reference so that no clue can be resolved by string matching, and admit only questions that a reference model fails closed-book yet solves once the supporting evidence is supplied. These questions are then turned into trajectories, which are filtered at both the trajectory and the turn level before SFT. The policy is then optimized by RL against live search, with the reward judge and the observation summarizer served inside the training cluster, and with over-long rollouts interrupted at the request level and resumed from their committed prefix at the next step. We alternate the two stages in a procedure we call SFT-RL climbing, returning the hardest solved and most efficient rollouts of each RL round to the next supervised pass. Because inference-time context management is worth more on these benchmarks than most reported differences between systems, we evaluate every benchmark both with and without it, holding the tool set, the context limit, and the judge fixed. All results come from a single ReAct agent, with no sub-agents and no test-time verification. With management enabled, on BrowseComp, BrowseComp-ZH, DeepSearchQA, and HLE the two models reach $82.2/84.8/86.9/52.3$ and $88.6/85.1/92.9/56.4$, the strongest overall results among open-source search agents in their respective parameter ranges. We plan to release the model weights together with the complete recipe for data construction, training, and evaluation.

Read the original paper

More in AI Agents

Browse all 56 papers →
01Agent

LEGO-Anything: Coding Agents for 3D Scene Reconstruction

Xirui Li, Peng Shi, Mingwen Dong, Sheng Zhang, Zhuoyan Xu, Dongkyu Lee, Shuaichen Chang, Yi Xiang, Lin Pan, Jiarong Jiang

LEGO-Anything turns images into editable Blender programs through iterative coding agents, offering a promising but still imperfect route to reconstructable 3D worlds.

Read analysis
02Agent

MILO: Automated Harness Discovery via Orchestrated Multi-Agent Evolution

Prithwish Jana, Mononito Goswami, Hao Liu, Xinyu Li, Langlin Huang, Zhehui Huang, Zhishen Huang, Patrick Blöbaum, Anoop Deoras, Purak Jain, Nikos Kanakaris, Sahika Genc

MILO uses teams of evolving AI agents to automatically discover better harnesses for long-horizon problem-solving systems.

Read analysis
03Agent

Self-Organizing Agent Teams Learn to Reason Together

Aneesh Pappu, Mirac Suzgun, Yongchan Kwon, Federico Bianchi, Batu El, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Hancheng Cao, James Zou

This work trains AI agents to discover how to divide labor, challenge ideas, and combine reasoning so that teams can solve problems no individual agent could solve alone.

Read analysis