NTH

WOVEN: Weaving Visual World Modeling into Multimodal LLMs

AuthorsZheyu Fan, Yue Zhang, Mingkai Deng, Kangrui Wang, Qineng Wang, Canyu Chen, Jie Hao, Xing Fan, Chenlei Guo, Eric P. Xing, Mohit Bansal, Manling Li

AffiliationsNorthwestern University · UNC Chapel Hill · Carnegie Mellon University · Amazon € Website

October 21, 2026 3 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

WOVEN trains multimodal models to reason about how visual scenes change, aiming to improve performance across many embodied and temporal tasks.

Key results

36,076
WOVEN examples

Total examples in the training source and benchmark.

65.8%
GPT-5.4 accuracy

Best frontier-model score, compared with a 92.3% human baseline.

89.3%
Qwen2.5-VL-3B trained accuracy

In-distribution WOVEN accuracy after fine-tuning, up from 26.4%.

22
Benchmarks improved

Targeted subsets improved 22 of 26 external benchmarks, with gains up to 27.3 percentage points.

27.3
Maximum external gain

Percentage-point gain on an external benchmark from targeted-subset training.

50%
Task-data replacement

WOVEN supervision replaced 30–50% of task-specific training data with comparable accuracy.

What the paper found

WOVEN treats visual transition reasoning—the ability to infer how an action links an initial scene to its outcome—as a shared capability behind multimodal models’ spatial, physical, embodied, and temporal reasoning. It uses the video generator Wan2.2-I2V-A14B to build 36,076 examples across 20 scene types, five action types, and eight reasoning operations, including forward and inverse dynamics, counterfactuals, physical prediction, and temporal ordering. In an evaluation of 38 frontier models, OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 scored 65.8% against a 92.3% human baseline; Meta’s Llama-4-Maverick and Qwen3-VL were also among the models assessed. Fine-tuning Qwen2.5-VL-3B raised its WOVEN accuracy from 26.4% to 89.3%, while targeted subsets of about 2,000 examples each improved 22 of 26 external benchmarks, with gains reaching 27.3 percentage points. The central finding is that transfer depends more on the reasoning operation taught than on matching the training scenes or actions; larger visual state changes also improve robustness. The authors’ practical recipe is to train temporal and agent-driven reasoning directly, and retain separate supervision for static perception. WOVEN data can also replace 30–50% of task-specific training examples while preserving comparable accuracy, positioning visual transition reasoning as reusable training signal rather than a task-specific trick.

Original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) struggle with spatial, embodied, physical, and temporal reasoning. We hypothesize that these failures reflect a shared deficit in visual transition reasoning, and test whether this capability can serve as a shared training primitive, one that different models can learn from different supervision sources and reuse across different tasks, with a systematic training recipe. Existing benchmarks document these deficits separately but do not support controlled comparisons across scenes, actions, and reasoning operations. We therefore introduce WOVEN, a training source and benchmark for visual transition reasoning that organizes transition supervision by scene, action, and reasoning type, using diverse, realistic rollouts from video-pretrained generative models: 36,076 examples across 20 scene types, 5 action types, and 8 reasoning types. We first evaluate 38 frontier MLLMs (e.g., GPT-5.4 and Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B) and find a substantial and systematic deficit: even the strongest models fall far below humans, and the failures recur across model families and persist with scale. We then train MLLMs at multiple scales on WOVEN and find that they learn a shared capability that transfers broadly: training subsets of only about 2,000 items each collectively improve 22 of 26 external benchmarks by up to 27.3 percentage points, and WOVEN data can replace 30-50% of a task's own training data with comparable accuracy. Controlled comparisons further yield a training recipe for visual world modeling, validated prospectively on held-out benchmarks: select supervision by the reasoning operation it teaches rather than by the actions, scenes, or domains it shows, and prefer larger changes to the visual state for robustness. Our work establishes visual transition reasoning as a reusable foundation for systematic visual world-model training in MLLMs.

Read the original paper

More in World Models

Browse all 44 papers →
01World Model

GreenWAM: A World Foundation Model for Robotics

Gennady Sidorov, Valerii Kornilov, Denis Grankin, Polina Fedotova, Aleksey Postnikov

GreenWAM aims to give many kinds of robots one shared model that can both predict what actions will do and choose actions to perform.

Read analysis
03World Model

4Director: Controlling Video World Models with Rigid 3D Geometry

Wei Cao, Hao Zhang, Vikram Voleti, Yuqun Wu, Mallikarjun B R, Shimon Vainer, Mark Boss, Yaoyao Liu

4Director makes video world models controllable by moving explicit 3D meshes through time while preserving realistic, consistent appearances.

Read analysis