NTH

TinyAstral: Transferring Self-Evolving Harnesses to Tiny Generalist Manipulation Agents

AuthorsKehong Gong, Xiaoxu Zheng, Guanli Hou, Seunghun Lee, Mengqi Guo, Runjia Tan, Zhengyu Wen, Qi Wang, Xiaoyu He, Mingyuan Zhang, Michael Bi Mi

AffiliationsHuawei Technologies Co., Ltd Huawei Noah Research Institute Independent Researcher*Corresponding author

November 3, 2026 2 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

TinyAstral evolves a robot agent’s harness and distills its gains into a smaller model that approaches its teacher’s performance with lower inference cost.

Key results

30.2
RoboTwin teacher harness gain

Percentage-point increase in success from the initial to final harness.

63.6%
Final teacher success on RoboTwin-50

Success rate with the evolved harness.

62.8%
TinyAstral-4B success on RoboTwin-50

Final student success rate.

93.6%
TinyAstral-4B success on Guava

Student success rate.

78.3%
TinyAstral-4B success on LIBERO-PRO

Student success rate.

25.3
Student deployment accelerator time

Accelerator-seconds per episode; the teacher uses 123.8.

What the paper found

TinyAstral connects recursive self-improvement of a robot agent’s harness with distillation into a compact manipulation model. Frontier language-model agents inspect trajectories from a frozen 180B Qwen3.8-Flash-Next teacher and propose changes to its tools, feedback, memory, and recovery logic; paired statistical tests decide which edits are accepted. The final harness is then frozen, and the teacher’s reasoning, tool calls, and recoveries from injected failures are distilled into Qwen3.5-4B. On the 500 RoboTwin-50 episodes, the teacher improves from 33.4% to 63.6% success, a gain of 30.2 percentage points, while the student reaches 62.8%, compared with 41.2% for the untrained 4B model. The student also scores 93.6% on Guava and 78.3% on LIBERO-PRO, and transfers to unseen SimplerEnv, VLABench, and EB-Manipulation. The paper compares its results with systems and models including DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, GPT-6 Astra, Gemini, and π0, while noting that published comparisons use differing protocols. In deployment measurements, TinyAstral-4B takes 25.3 accelerator-seconds per episode versus 123.8 for its teacher, roughly one fifth as much accelerator time.

Original abstract

Robot agents built on vision-language models depend on both the planner and its harness: the tools, feedback, memory, and recovery logic around it. Can improvements to a large teacher's harness be carried into a compact agent with lower inference compute cost? We present TinyAstral, a two-stage approach. We first freeze an open-weight teacher and improve its harness through recursive self-improvement (RSI): frontier LLM agents read the teacher's trajectories and propose harness edits, and each edit is accepted only if it passes a paired statistical test. We then freeze the final harness, collect teacher trajectories with reasoning and failure recovery, and distill a small student that replaces the teacher in the same harness. On RoboTwin, harness evolution raises the teacher's success from 33.4% to 63.6%; the final 4B student reaches 62.8%. Across four harness versions, distilled 4B students score close to their corresponding teachers, and later versions yield stronger students, showing that harness evolution gains carry into compact models. The harness gains also transfer to other frozen planners without retraining. On identical episodes, the final 4B student outperforms open 4B agents, the open 27B harness-RSI model SenseNova-RoboRSI, and our own teacher model placed in three competitors' harnesses. It stays close to its teacher on all three training benchmarks, and on three benchmarks never used for RSI or training it scores close to a 552B planner running the same harness. On the measured deployment episodes, it uses about one fifth of its teacher's accelerator time.

Read the original paper

More in Embodied AI

Browse all 60 papers →
03Embodied Ai

Scaling Online Exploration for Robot Agents

Runhan Huang, Xiangcheng Zhang, Haoyu Chen, Yitong Li, Yen-Jen Wang, Bohan Lyu, Haotian Ye, Chuye Hong, Yixuan Wang, Chloe Su, Haoyu Xiong, Yangzhen Wu, Enze Xie, Travis Manderson, Stefano Ermon, Pieter Abbeel, Antonio Torralba, Dawn Song, Weirui Ye, Yilun Du

RAX lets coding agents explore, learn, and compose robot skills across different embodiments without relying on human demonstrations.

Read analysis