NTH

SRPO: Self-Reflective Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon Reasoning

AuthorsJialong Liu, Yuling Shi, Ning Yang, Xiaodong Gu, Zuchao Li

August 29, 2026 2 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

SRPO teaches language models to turn their own mistakes into step-by-step learning signals, improving long-horizon reasoning and agent performance with relatively little training.

Key results

73.3%
AIME’24 accuracy

Qwen3-8B performance after SRPO training

64.7%
WebShop success rate

Long-horizon shopping-agent benchmark result

76.8%
ALFWorld success rate

Interactive household-task benchmark result

31.2%
SWE-Bench-Lite pass rate

Real-world software-engineering benchmark result

3.8
FLOP reduction versus GRPO

SRPO uses 3.8× fewer total training FLOPs than GRPO

What the paper found

SRPO, or Self-Reflective Policy Optimization, addresses the credit-assignment failure of PPO and GRPO on long-horizon reasoning, where a terminal success signal provides only sparse episode-level supervision. Using a two-stage process, the model first reviews a completed trajectory and compresses its diagnosis into a 2–5-point reflection patch, then prepends that patch to the original prompt through reset-with-memory. The reflection-conditioned policy becomes a temporary teacher, while the unmodified policy generates on-policy rollouts and is trained with teacher-forced, per-token reverse-KL rewards and a clipped PPO objective. This converts sparse feedback from O(1) information per episode into O(T) token-level signals without external critics, reward models, or larger teachers. On Qwen3-8B, SRPO reaches 73.3% on AIME’24, 64.7% on WebShop, 76.8% on ALFWorld, and 31.2% on SWE-Bench-Lite, while using 3.8× fewer total FLOPs than GRPO. The method also generalizes across Qwen3-1.5B, Qwen3-32B, and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct. Ablations show that compact, semantically aligned reflections, reverse KL, and state resetting are essential; verbose or mismatched reflections largely eliminate the gains. Reflection quality was additionally assessed with GPT-4, supporting SRPO’s central claim that self-generated hindsight guidance can internalize corrective reasoning without requiring a stronger external model.

Original abstract

Self-reflection is a powerful mechanism for credit assignment in human learning, converting sparse outcome feedback into actionable guidance. However, its potential for post-training Large Language Models (LLMs) remains underexplored. We propose Self-Reflective Policy Optimization (SRPO), a framework that internalizes this capability. SRPO enables LLMs to analyze their own completed trajectories, synthesize errors into concise "reflection patches," and use reflection-conditioned teacher scores on student on-policy rollouts as dense token-level training signals. This process effectively transforms sparse terminal supervision into dense, token-level learning signals without requiring external critics, separate reward models, or larger teacher models. We demonstrate that SRPO achieves state-of-the-art performance across mathematical reasoning and long-horizon agentic benchmarks with exceptional data efficiency. Using a Qwen3-8B base model, SRPO attains 73.3% on AIME'24 using only 8% (0.08x) of the training FLOPs required by scaled supervised fine-tuning, while significantly improving success rates on WebShop (64.7%), ALFWorld (76.8%), and SWE-Bench-Lite (31.2%). Code is available at https://github.com/Galleons2029/SRPO

Read the original paper

More in AI Reasoning

Browse all 39 papers →
02Reasoning

On Language Drift during RLVR Post-Training

Michael Sullivan, Alexander Koller

RLVR can make reasoning models increasingly use strange internal languages, and preventing that drift may require sacrificing some performance.

Read analysis