NTH

Rethinking Projector Training in Multimodal LLMs

AuthorsFabian Gröger, Naël Ouerghemi, Shuo Wen, Maria Brbić

AffiliationsEPFL · University of Basel · HSLU

October 19, 2026 2 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

The paper shows that multimodal LLMs may not need projector training at all, introducing a data-free method that nearly matches the standard approach.

Key results

10%
Paired alignment data needed for most gains

The paper reports that 10% to 20% of the standard data recovers most downstream gains.

558k
Standard alignment dataset

Image-caption pairs used to train the conventional projector baseline.

106.2%
Best PORTAL score relative to baseline

PORTAL’s peak relative score, in the LLaMA 3.2 1B and CLIP setting.

135×
Alignment compute reduction

Fewer projector-alignment FLOPs when PORTAL initializes the projector.

What the paper found

Projector training in multimodal LLMs may do less than its standard role suggests: the study finds it mainly performs coarse geometric alignment, rather than learning a unique image-to-language mapping. In LLaVA-style experiments, just 10% to 20% of the usual paired data recovered most of the benefit, and projectors trained on different datasets could be linearly blended without losing performance. The authors introduce PORTAL, which replaces projector training with a closed-form Bures-Wasserstein optimal-transport map between Gaussian approximations of visual and language features, using their means and a shared top-512 PCA subspace. It needs no paired captions or gradient updates. Across seven vision-encoder and language-model settings, including Meta’s Llama and Alibaba’s Qwen with CLIP or SigLIP, PORTAL matched a baseline trained on 558k image-caption pairs; it reached 106.2% of that baseline in its best setting and averaged about 98% across the other four settings where it did not exceed the baseline. Used as an initialization and refined with paired data, PORTAL reached baseline performance with roughly 135× fewer alignment FLOPs. The main shortfall appears on OCR-heavy tasks, where distribution summaries may miss fine character layout that paired supervision can teach.

Original abstract

Multimodal LLMs are typically trained by first aligning a vision encoder with a language model via projector training on large image-caption datasets, followed by joint training of the full multimodal model. Despite its widespread use, the role of the projector training stage remains poorly understood. We find that (i) using only $10$ to $20\%$ of the data for training the projector already recovers most downstream performance gains, and (ii) projectors trained on different datasets can be linearly interpolated while largely preserving performance. These results suggest that projector training mainly performs a coarse alignment, which many different projectors achieve equally well. Motivated by these findings, we propose PORTAL, a training-free projector initialization that requires neither paired image-caption data nor gradient-based optimization, but only per-modality summary statistics. PORTAL computes an optimal-transport-based map between Gaussian approximations of the vision and language feature distributions on a shared principal subspace, so that the projector training stage can be skipped entirely. Without any paired data, PORTAL matches the standard pipeline trained on 558k image-caption pairs across six LLM backbones, two vision encoders, and 16 benchmarks. It outperforms that pipeline in $3$ of $7$ (vision encoder, LLM) settings and reaches an average $98\%$ of its score across the other four.

Read the original paper

More in Multimodal AI

Browse all 67 papers →
01Multimodal

Scaling Laws for Multimodal Data Mixtures

Aditi Khandelwal, Ayush K. Tarun, Yixuan Xu, Imanol Schlag, Golnoosh Farnadi, Siva Reddy, Luke Zettlemoyer, Antoine Bosselut

A large-scale study finds that text, vision, and audio need different data and model-size tradeoffs—and that vision can hinder audio learning.

Read analysis