NTH

OptScientist: Automated Discovery of Optimization Laws

AuthorsMa ZhenYao, Yue Liang, Jian-Qiao Zhu

AffiliationsPlokerm AI Lab · Xiamen University · University of Tübingen · The University of Hong Kong

October 27, 2026 2 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

OptScientist uses symbolic modeling and an LLM agent to infer the optimization rules that may underlie scientific and social phenomena.

Key results

99
OptFeynman benchmark size

Physics-derived optimization problems in the benchmark.

88
Discrete exact-order recovery

Tasks with perfect preference-order recovery out of 99.

78
Continuous exact-order recovery

Tasks with perfect preference-order recovery out of 99.

82.9%
CPC18 held-out accuracy

Direct symbolic law, using five numerical constants.

78.6%
Monetary-policy stance accuracy

Out-of-time accuracy; direction accuracy was 85.7% with 11 constants.

5,976
Monetary-policy output tokens

OptScientist output tokens for the policy discovery task.

What the paper found

OptScientist targets a different kind of scientific discovery: instead of fitting an equation from inputs to outputs, it tries to recover the compact optimization law that generates observed outcomes. Its OptLearner first learns a denoised optimization representation, then OptDiscover distills that representation into symbolic objectives and constraints; an agent system adds literature-based priors, evaluates candidate laws, and proposes follow-up data. On OptFeynman, a benchmark of 99 physics-derived problems, the symbolic laws exactly recovered the full preference order on 88 of 99 discrete tasks and 78 of 99 continuous tasks. On CPC18 human choices, the discovered law combines immediate reward, switching costs, and forgone rewards, reaching 82.9% held-out accuracy with five numerical constants. For monetary policy, it identifies decisions as tracking a latent target, reaching 78.6% stance accuracy and 85.7% direction accuracy with 11 constants. Compared with LLM discovery systems using DeepSeek-V4-Flash, OptScientist achieved 78.6% policy accuracy with 5,976 output tokens, illustrating how symbolic modeling can pair predictive performance with compact explanations and lower language-model output.

Original abstract

Many scientific phenomena are best understood as outcomes of underlying optimization problems, yet automated scientific discovery has largely focused on recovering equations that describe observed input-output patterns. We introduce OptScientist, a novel automated framework for discovering compact symbolic optimization laws directly from data. OptScientist comprises (i) a model that infers symbolic optimization problems by first learning to represent data as an optimization problem and then extracting its symbolic form, and (ii) an LLM agentic system embedding the model in a discovery process that integrates theoretical priors from scientific literature, discovers candidate laws, abstracts their underlying mechanisms, and suggests new data to collect. We first evaluate OptScientist on OptFeynman, a novel benchmark of 99 physics-derived optimization problems, where OptScientist recovers ground-truth laws for over 80% of the problems and remains robust to noisy contextual information, while substantially outperforming machine-learning, symbolic, and LLM-based model-discovery baselines. On human risky choice and central-bank monetary policy, OptScientist discovers compact symbolic optimization laws that achieve held-out predictive performance competitive with leading baselines, while using few parameters and substantially fewer tokens than LLM baselines. Overall, OptScientist extends automated scientific discovery to uncovering optimization laws that generate observed phenomena, enabling automated theory building across the physical, biological, behavioral, and social sciences.

Read the original paper

More in AI for Science

Browse all 49 papers →
02Scientific Ai

Self-Building Labs

Jiaru Bai, Yuchi Zhao, Han Hao, Miroslav Bogdanovic, Yang Cao, Varinia Bernales, Alán Aspuru-Guzik

An AI system turns scientific goals into working lab setups, robots, and experiments.

Read analysis
03Scientific Ai

DiscoveryRSI: Recursively Learning to Discover Valuable Hypotheses

Jianyuan Zhong, Chenwei Wu, Zhaochen Yu, Xixian Jiang, Xuewei Li, Hao Xiao, Xilin Dai, Junyang Wang, Jiaru Zou, Zhiqing Cui, Boyuan Zheng, Jing Xiong, Zhen Zhang, Qiang Gao, Michael Morley, Luis Nakayama, Qiang Xu, Liyue Shen, Tao Gui, Leo Anthony Celi, James Zou, Zhenfei Yin, Yingcheng Wu, Ling Yang

DiscoveryRSI aims to make AI research agents better at proposing testable scientific hypotheses by learning from their own investigations.

Read analysis