NTH

NavGPT-3: Harnessing Context in a Hierarchical Navigation Runtime

AuthorsGengze Zhou, Yicong Hong, Jiazhao Zhang, Xunyi Zhao, Jian Zhou, Zixing Lei, Zun Wang, Chongyang Zhao, Xionghui Chen, Stephen Gould, Anton van den Hengel, Qi Wu

AffiliationsAIML, Adelaide University · Roblox · PKU · SJTU · UNC Chapel Hill · UNSW†Correspondence to: {gengze.zhou, qi.wu01}@adelaide.edu.auProject Page: https://metacognitionai.github.io/NavGPT3/ · Metacognition · ANU

October 18, 2026 3 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

NavGPT-3 pairs a reasoning language model with a fast action policy so a robot can navigate complex routes at human-level performance.

Key results

19.28M
NavGPT VLA training mixture

Effective training examples across navigation, grounding, and embodied tasks.

81.51%
R2R-CE success rate

Full NAV GPT-3 system with GPT-6 Astra as planner.

90.43%
RxR-CE success rate

Full system result, matching the human-follower score of 90.4%.

78.47
RxR-CE nDTW

Path-fidelity score, compared with 77.7 for human followers.

83.3%
Unitree Go2 task success

Overlapping planning and execution with priority safety monitoring.

180
Unitree Go2 p95 halt latency

Milliseconds under the full runtime, versus 1,840 ms with sequential queued handling.

What the paper found

NAV GPT-3 connects a reasoning language model to a fast vision-language-action policy through an OS-like navigation runtime. The runtime runs planning, movement, and safety monitoring asynchronously, manages which process can move the robot, and lets the planner inspect maps, backtrack, repair routes, and explicitly end a task. Its 8B NavGPT VLA, initialized from Qwen3-VL-Instruct, uses codec-style visual-token allocation to give more detail to views that change and is trained on 19.28M examples spanning navigation, grounding, and other embodied tasks. With GPT-6 Astra as planner, the full system reaches 81.51% success on R2R-CE; on RxR-CE it achieves 90.43% success and 78.47 nDTW, matching human followers on both success and path fidelity. On a Unitree Go2 robot, overlapping planning with movement and priority safety monitoring yields 83.3% task success and reduces 95th-percentile halt latency to 180 ms, compared with 73.3% success and 1,840 ms for sequential handling. The results show that robust coordination and route-repair tools can make a learned policy’s fast control work effectively with a language model’s long-horizon reasoning.

Original abstract

Language models trained with long-horizon agentic reinforcement learning can generalize knowledge through reasoning, express precise actions, and pursue goals over many steps, raising the ceiling on what an embodied agent can understand and decide. Physical interaction, however, remains the domain of action policies, which provide dense, low-latency control. We present NavGPT-3, a harness that connects the two models, with an OS-like runtime built above it: reasoning, acting, and monitoring run as threads with their own context, tools, and permissions, while the runtime schedules them and decides which thread controls the robot's motion, so that the robot can react to sudden real-world events through interruption and thread switching. Beneath it, our action policy NavGPT VLA, trained on 19.28M examples, allocates visual tokens using codec allocation, in proportion to scene change; its 8B model alone reaches 74.51 SR on R2R-CE and leads RxR-CE with 78.19 SR. With the complete harness, NavGPT-3 sets the state of the art on R2R-CE (81.51 SR) and, for the first time, brings an autonomous agent to human level: on RxR-CE it matches human followers in success (90.43 vs. 90.4 SR) and path fidelity (78.47 vs. 77.7 nDTW) at 1 min 22 s per episode, versus roughly 3 min for a human. We comprehensively ablate the harness design and the interaction between the two models, showing how tools and the action policy shape the path from language-model reasoning to physical control: when NavGPT VLA executes the route, the reasoning loop shortens and the system's minimum reaction time falls from 3-19 s per language-model decision to 0.5-1 s per action-policy step (1-2 Hz). These results show that designing this embodied interface is central to connecting frontier language-model intelligence with low-level physical control. We will release all models, code, and evaluation records.

Read the original paper

More in Embodied AI

Browse all 51 papers →
01Embodied Ai

In-context Robot Learning Made Simple: A Democratized Recipe for Manipulation Tasks

Minxing Li, Minghao Han, Weizhi Zhao, Hanwen Wang, Xiangshuo Liu, Shuyao Shang, Jingxiang Zhou, Mingchao Sun, Hongyu Pan, Mu Xu, Yu Liu, Lue Fan, Zhaoxiang Zhang

SimpleICL presents an accessible recipe for teaching robots manipulation tasks from visual demonstrations without massive pretraining or specialized infrastructure.

Read analysis
02Embodied Ai

SuperNav: An Agentic Navigation System for Any Task in Any Scene

Jinkai Zhang, Jingyi Xu, Yuanhong Yu, Jiarui Guo, Ruizhen Hu, Hujun Bao, Xiaowei Zhou, Sida Peng

SuperNav turns a general-purpose multimodal model into a versatile robot navigator by letting it reason about tasks and scenes while specialized tools handle movement.

Read analysis
03Embodied Ai

GroundingPI: A Grounding Foundation Model towards Physical Intelligence with Visual Primitives

Qize Yu, Lianrui Fan, Boyu Chen, Jiaqi Liang, Xini Ding, Yue Chen, Zetian Song, Yuran Wang, Yi Zou, Kaixuan Wang, Tianxing Chen, Wenxuan Song, Bohan Zhou, Mingleyang Li, Siqiao Huang, Yuqi Ye, Caigao Jiang, Wei Wei, Ruihai Wu, Hang Zhang, Yixiao Ge, Shuchang Zhou, Shilong Liu, Xianming Liu, Ping Luo, Shiyu Huang

GroundingPI argues that fast, precise visual grounding should be the perceptual foundation for capable robots and autonomous vehicles.

Read analysis