NTH

LLMs as Noisy Channels: A Shannon Perspective on Model Capacity and Scaling Laws

AuthorsXu Ouyang, Deyi Liu, Yuhang Cai, Jing Liu, Yuan Yang, Chen Zheng, Thomas Hartvigsen, Yiyuan Ma

June 2, 2026 2 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

This paper treats LLM training like information flowing through a noisy channel, offering a new scaling law that explains why bigger models and more data can sometimes make performance worse.

Key results

0.9555
Pythia Gaussian noise R2

The full Shannon Scaling Law achieved R2 = 0.9555 on Pythia at 10 dB Gaussian noise, outperforming the strongest baseline.

0.945
Simplified Shannon extrapolation R2

The 6-parameter simplified Shannon law reached pooled R2 = 0.945 on long-horizon token extrapolation.

0.847
Joint extrapolation R2

The full 9-parameter Shannon law predicted the unseen 12B Pythia model up to 307B tokens at pooled R2 = 0.847.

What the paper found

ByteDance Seed researchers from the University of Virginia and UC Berkeley recast large language models as noisy communication channels and derive the Shannon Scaling Law from the Shannon–Hartley theorem, mapping model size N to channel bandwidth, training tokens D to signal power, and perturbation-dependent noise to a denominator that includes both data noise dD^δ and model-interaction noise c(DN)^γ. The paper explains why standard monotonic power laws from OpenAI and Chinchilla break under catastrophic overtraining and quantization-induced degradation, where performance becomes U-shaped instead of steadily improving. On Pythia and OLMo2, evaluated on wikitext2, Gaussian weight noise at 40 dB to 10 dB, SFT on GSM8K, SocialIQA, and StarCoder-Python, and GPTQ quantization at 4-bit, 3-bit, and 2-bit, the full law consistently achieves the best fit, with average R2 above 0.95 in most settings and 0.9555 on Pythia at 10 dB versus 0.8251 for the strongest baseline. A simplified 6-parameter variant still reaches pooled R2 = 0.945 on long-horizon token extrapolation, while the full 9-parameter form is strongest for joint extrapolation, predicting an unseen 12B Pythia model up to 307B tokens at pooled R2 = 0.847, where OpenAI and Chinchilla drop below zero. The central result is that scaling only helps when signal-to-noise ratio stays above a capacity threshold; otherwise, more parameters or more tokens can amplify noise and worsen loss.

Original abstract

Existing scaling laws for Large Language Models (LLMs), predominantly monotonic power laws, fail to explain emerging non-monotonic phenomena such as catastrophic overtraining and quantization-induced degradation, where performance deteriorates despite increased compute. We propose the Shannon Scaling Law, a unified theoretical framework that models LLM training as information transmission over a noisy channel, grounded in the Shannon-Hartley theorem. By mapping model parameters to channel bandwidth and training tokens to signal power, our formulation explicitly captures the interaction between learning signal and intrinsic noise. This perspective reveals a fundamental Shannon capacity for LLMs: scaling model size or data without preserving a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) inevitably amplifies noise, inducing a transition from monotonic improvement to U-shaped performance degradation. We validate our theory through experiments on Pythia and OLMo2 under perturbations, including Gaussian noise, quantization and supervised fine-tuning on math, QA and code tasks. The Shannon Scaling Law consistently outperforms classical scaling laws and recent perturbation-aware laws, achieving strong $R^2$ scores and accurately capturing loss basins missed by prior approaches. It also extrapolates: fitted on $\leq$6.9B Pythia models with $\leq$180B tokens, it predicts the unseen 12B model up to 307B tokens at pooled $R^2{=}0.847$, while monotonic baselines collapse.

Read the original paper

More in Large Language Models

Browse all 81 papers →
02Llm

Generalization Dynamics of LM Pre-training

Jiaxin Wen, Zhengxuan Wu, Dawn Song, Lijie Chen

Language models may repeatedly switch between shallow memorization and genuine reasoning during training, and the paper shows how to detect and potentially control these swings.

Read analysis
03Llm

Rethinking Self-Distillation for Multi-Teacher Capability Merging

Roy Xie, Dan Friedman, Feng Nan, Yukun Huang, Zhichao Xu, Chengjiu Zhang, Jun Xu, Manaal Faruqui, Vivek Rathod, Bhuwan Dhingra

The study finds that expensive multi-teacher on-policy distillation may offer little advantage over carefully tuned, cheaper alternatives such as SFT and weight merging.

Read analysis