NTH

Learning Where to Split: Dynamic Band Splitting for Audio Source Separation

AuthorsBingzhe Zhang, Kai Li, Xiaolin Hu

AffiliationsDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Institute for AI, BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China · IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China · Chinese Institute for Brain Research (CIBR), Beijing 100010, China

October 16, 2026 2 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

The method learns where to split an audio spectrum for more effective source separation without increasing the number of band tokens.

Key results

1.38
DnR v2 average SI-SDR gain

dB improvement for DBS-BSRNN over static BSRNN, using 128 band tokens.

1.84
MUSDB18-HQ four-stem SDR gain

dB improvement for DBS-BS-RoFormer over its static counterpart.

5.15
Frequency-refinement ablation drop

dB average SI-SDR decrease on DnR v2 when frequency refinement is removed.

128
DnR v2 band-token budget

Fixed band-token count shared by static and dynamic models.

What the paper found

Dynamic Band Splitting (DBS) replaces fixed frequency-band layouts with mixture-conditioned boundaries while keeping the separator’s token budget unchanged. It predicts boundary scores within frequency blocks, uses hard Top-K selection to choose contiguous bands, and applies a straight-through estimator so separation loss can train the discrete boundary decisions. After separation, DBS smooths and expands the band tokens back onto the original spectrogram grid, refines frequency detail, and decodes complex masks. With 128 band tokens, DBS-BSRNN raised average SI-SDR on DnR v2 from 7.69 to 9.07 dB, a 1.38 dB gain over static BSRNN. On MUSDB18-HQ, DBS-BS-RoFormer improved average four-stem SDR from 4.50 to 6.34 dB, a 1.84 dB gain. On EchoSet, DBS-BSRNN increased SDR improvement by 0.46 dB. An ablation showed that removing frequency refinement reduced average SI-SDR by 5.15 dB, highlighting the importance of restoring detail after token compression. The method also improved BSRNN, TIGER, and MelRoFormer variants, with experiments run on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 GPUs.

Original abstract

Audio source separation models must preserve fine spectral structure while keeping the cost of the separator tractable. Band-split architectures reduce this cost by manually partitioning the spectrum into predefined frequency bands and encoding each band as a token, but the same boundaries are used for every mixture. Because informative spectral structure varies with source content, fixed boundaries can merge discriminative components or spend tokens where little resolution is needed. We introduce Dynamic Band Splitting (DBS), an end-to-end framework that adapts boundary locations and band widths to each mixture under a fixed band-token budget. DBS predicts content-conditioned boundary scores within frequency blocks, selects a prescribed number of boundaries using hard Top-$K$, and applies content-dependent pooling to obtain compact band tokens. After separation, it smooths and expands these tokens to the original STFT grid, refines them along frequency, and decodes complex masks with a frequency-shared head. DBS improved separation over the corresponding static models on DnR v2, MUSDB18-HQ, and EchoSet, with DBS-BSRNN achieving relative gain of 29.0% in average SI-SDR on DnR v2. These results and boundary analyses on DnR v2 show that content-adaptive frequency partitioning benefits multiple separator backbones under a fixed band-token budget. Code and audio demos are available at https://cslikai.cn/Dynamic-Band-Splitting

Read the original paper

More in Speech AI

Browse all 33 papers →
01Speech

Fish Audio Drama 3 Technical Report

Dawei Han, Shidong Li, Shijia Liao, Jiahua Liu, Songting Liu, Qingzheng Wang, Yuxuan Wang, Xin Chen, Yifan Cheng, Tianyu Li, Gangin Park, Xuehao Yang, Chang Zeng, Haoyang Zhang, Ruoyi Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang

Fish Audio Drama 3 is an open-source speech model designed to perform, revise, and edit expressive multi-character audio from text.

Read analysis