Early Signatures of Memorization in Diffusion Models via Basin Geometry and Cyclic Denoising
AuthorsNikhil Verma, Siddharthan Dileep, Anoop Singh, Srikanth Sastry, Ramya Hebbalaguppe, Sayan Ranu, N. M. Anoop Krishnan
AffiliationsYardi School of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi · Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi · Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research · TCS Research Labs · Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi**Equal contribution
A new cyclic-denoising test can expose what a diffusion model has memorized before its usual outputs show any copies.
Key results
At the checkpoint where cyclic denoising increased the detected memorized fraction.
Cycling raised the fraction to more than this level.
Cycles used for the CelebA result.
Conditional–unconditional score-divergence gap after cycling.
Prompt-detection performance after cycling.
What the paper found
Diffusion models can encode training images before ordinary generation produces recognizable copies. This paper detects that latent memorization through the geometry of the learned score: localized energy basins form around training examples, visible as changes in score divergence and recovery-based basin volume, with their onset scaling as O(n), like the time to visible memorization. Repeated partial noising and denoising—cyclic denoising—can reach these otherwise hidden basins. On CelebA, a checkpoint with just 0.1% one-shot memorized outputs yielded more than 30% after 500 cycles. The authors also find that stable cycling does not always mean memorization: degenerate attractors that match no individual training image are common early in training and fade later. On off-the-shelf Stable Diffusion v1.4, a conditional–unconditional score-divergence gap after cycling distinguished memorized prompts with an AUC of 0.944 and a true-positive rate of 0.866 at 1% false-positive rate. The result offers an earlier way to audit diffusion models than counting copies in one-shot outputs, while showing that the same probing method can expose training images.
Original abstract
Diffusion models generalize early in training and later reproduce individual training samples. Standard tests detect memorization only once one-shot generation produces near-copies, leaving a released model unaudited until its outputs fail. We show that memorization is encoded in the geometry of the learned energy landscape before it appears in generated samples, a state we call latent memorization. Using score divergence and basin volume, we find that localized basins form around training samples and separate them from held-out samples before the first memorized sample appears, with an onset that follows the same $O(n)$ scaling as the memorization time. We probe these basins with cyclic denoising, which repeatedly applies partial noising and denoising. Under the exact empirical score, we prove that cycling started near an isolated training sample recovers it and returns to it over any finite number of cycles with high probability. In trained models, cycling recovers training images from CelebA and CIFAR-10 checkpoints whose one-shot samples contain no copies, and at a CelebA checkpoint with 0.1% one-shot copies, 500 cycles raise the memorized fraction above 30%. Cycling also reveals degenerate attractors that match no single training image and fade as training proceeds, so residence in a basin does not by itself imply memorization. These findings hold on a Gaussian mixture, CelebA, and CIFAR-10 across optimizers, architectures, noise schedules, and training-set sizes, and extend to off-the-shelf Stable Diffusion v1.4, where the cycled conditional-unconditional divergence gap separates memorized from non-memorized prompts with an AUC of 0.944 and a TPR of 0.866 at 1% FPR. More broadly, what a diffusion model has memorized is a property of the geometry and stability of its learned distribution, and assessing it requires examining this structure rather than generated outputs alone.
Read the original paperMore in Diffusion Models
Browse all 67 papers →Does Physics Live in the Activations? Localizing Physical Quantities in Video Diffusion Models
Jonas Kneifl, Jakub Skalski, Bartłomiej Twardowski, Kamil Deja
This study looks inside video diffusion models to find where they represent physics—and shows those hidden representations can even be used to steer what the model generates.
Large Language Continuous Diffusion Models
Zhihan Yang, Wei Guo, Jean-Marie Lemercier, Simon Welker, Yonggan Fu, Mohammad Mahdi Kamani, Sajad Norouzi, Julius Berner, Tomas Geffner, Karsten Kreis, Yongxin Chen, Molei Tao, John Thickstun, Pavlo Molchanov, Ante Jukić, Arash Vahdat, Morteza Mardani
Sigma brings continuous, steerable diffusion trajectories to large language models, aiming to make parallel generation faster and more controllable without sacrificing reasoning or coding ability.
DuoMatching: Joint-Marginal Distribution Matching for Few-Step Video Generation
Jiahao Zhan, Yan Wang, Yongrui Ma, Qunliang Xing, Ruchang Yao, Runtao Liu, Shijie Zhao, Tianfan Xue
DuoMatching improves few-step video generation by combining video-level motion supervision with image-level visual and semantic guidance.