NTH

Accurate, Interdisciplinary and Transparent Structure-property Understanding with Deep Native Structural Reasoning

AuthorsChen Tang, Yizhou Wang, Jianyu Wu, Lintao Wang, Shixiang Tang, Pengze Li, Encheng Su, Jun Yao, Jiabei Xiao, Yuqi Shi, Jielan Li, Hongxia Hao, Zhangyang Gao, Fang Wu, Ben Fei, Xiangyu Yue, Pan Tan, Bozitao Zhong, Jinouwen Zhang, Aoran Wang, Yan Lu, Jiaheng Liu, Xinzhu Ma, Liang Hong, Mingyue Zheng, Phil Torr, Bowen Zhou, Wanli Ouyang, Lei Bai

July 14, 2026 2 min read
Watch on YouTube
The one-line take

SciReasoner is a new scientific AI model that turns molecular and material structures into reasoning-friendly tokens to boost prediction accuracy and make its conclusions easier to interpret.

Key results

0.55
Low-homology GO Fmax

Cellular Component annotation for low-homology proteins

0.42
GO Fmax baseline

Cellular Component annotation before SciReasoner

0.72
Retrosynthesis Exact Match

USPTO-50K single-step retrosynthesis

0.63
Retrosynthesis baseline

Prior best retrosynthesis baseline, RSGPT

7.70
DUD-E 5.0% EF

SciReasoner virtual-screening enrichment factor

67
Benchmarks with SOTA

State-of-the-art tasks out of 86 benchmarks

What the paper found

SciReasoner, developed by Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory with Qwen3-14B as its backbone, is a multimodal foundation model that converts protein Foldseek 3Di, molecular ConfSeq, and crystal SLICES encodings into a unified structure-aware vocabulary so it can reason over structure and text in a single autoregressive trace. The paper’s novelty is not just prediction accuracy but inspectable native structural reasoning: in homology-controlled Gene Ontology prediction it lifts low-homology Cellular Component Fmax from 0.42 to 0.55, in single-step retrosynthesis on USPTO-50K it raises Exact Match from 0.63 to 0.72, and on DUD-E it preserves the best AUC while improving 5.0% EF from 7.12 to 7.70. Across the full suite of 86 benchmarks spanning biology, chemistry, and materials, it reports state-of-the-art performance on 67 tasks. The training recipe combines staged continued pretraining with a self-bootstrapped post-training pipeline that first grounds structural evidence within domains and then consolidates it across domains using RL, which also improves first-sample reliability and reasoning quality. Human experts, in a double-blind study against DeepSeek-V4-Pro, preferred or tied SciReasoner in 98% of comparisons, indicating that its reasoning traces are not only more accurate but also more auditable and scientifically plausible.

Original abstract

Structure-property relationships are foundational to biology, chemistry and materials science, where function, reactivity and physical response emerge from spatial, chemical and periodic organization. Mechanistically explaining these relationships requires interpreting structural evidence through scientific principles and physical constraints, from stereochemistry and bonding to symmetry, energetics and periodic order. However, applying artificial intelligence to this process presents a joint challenge of representation and reasoning: models must preserve domain-native structural information while showing how specific evidence supports predictions under these constraints. Here we introduce SciReasoner, a multimodal scientific foundation model for native structural reasoning across proteins, small molecules and inorganic crystals. SciReasoner discretizes coordinates, topologies and periodic connectivities into a unified structure-aware vocabulary, treating structural tokens as addressable evidence units during reasoning. In homology-controlled Gene Ontology prediction, SciReasoner improves Cellular Component annotation for low-homology and orphan-like proteins, increasing $F_{\max}$ from 0.42 to 0.55. In chemistry, it raises single-step retrosynthesis accuracy from 0.63 to 0.72 while generating fragment-level disconnection and precursor-verification traces. In materials science, its representations separate elemental and compound phases and resolve high- and low-band-gap regimes. Across 86 benchmarks, SciReasoner achieves state-of-the-art performance on 67 tasks. Double-blind expert evaluation rates its reasoning traces as preferred or at least comparable to those of a frontier large language model in 98% of cases. By making structure an inspectable substrate for reasoning under scientific constraints, SciReasoner connects accurate prediction with interpretable scientific inference.

Read the original paper

More in AI for Science

Browse all 43 papers →
01Scientific Ai

AI-guided high-throughput discovery of iridium- and ruthenium-free palladium-oxide catalysts for durable acidic oxygen evolution

Ken J. Jenewein, Faezeh Habib Zadeh, Xiaoxiao Wang, Gustavo Malkomes, Huafan Zhang, Natalie Page, Jae Jin Bang, Peter J. Santiago, Karla V. Contreras, Katherine K. Li, Allison Perna, Lorena M. Britton, Fahrettin Kilic, Kevin J. Cruse, Armin Taheri, Krishnanand Mallayya, Harley Quinn, Rebecca A. Durr, Peter A. Beaucage, John M. Gregoire, Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli

An AI-guided robotic lab discovered palladium-based catalysts that could make acidic water electrolysis more durable while reducing dependence on scarce iridium and ruthenium.

Read analysis
03Scientific Ai

EurekaBench: Measuring Agentic Ability to Discover New Scientific Insights

Jiayi Geng, Zhengxuan Wu, Kevin S. Chen, Seungone Kim, Joseph Janssen, Zora Zhiruo Wang, Bhupalee Kalita, Runtian Gao, Aaron Ho, Andrew Oakleigh Nelson, Olexandr Isayev, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Ching-Yao Lai, Howard Chen, Graham Neubig

EurekaBench tests whether AI agents can move beyond accurate prediction to uncover mechanisms and insights that genuinely advance scientific understanding.

Read analysis